
28.7K
Downloads
787
Episodes
Alex Kopytko is a ”radical centrist” that wants to understand the extremes. He has worked in politics and has studied public policy and political science. Alex argues that centrism is less about being a contrarian, it is about being able to change your mind and embrace an openness to new ideas. He is concerned about where the United States is headed and through conversations with people from all sides of the political spectrum, he wants to know how Americans can limit the tribalism that is flourishing. As someone that dances along the center-right of the political spectrum, Alex thinks the country needs to come together and talk to one another before it could be too late. This podcast covers domestic politics, as well as political philosophy, and international issues.
Alex Kopytko is a ”radical centrist” that wants to understand the extremes. He has worked in politics and has studied public policy and political science. Alex argues that centrism is less about being a contrarian, it is about being able to change your mind and embrace an openness to new ideas. He is concerned about where the United States is headed and through conversations with people from all sides of the political spectrum, he wants to know how Americans can limit the tribalism that is flourishing. As someone that dances along the center-right of the political spectrum, Alex thinks the country needs to come together and talk to one another before it could be too late. This podcast covers domestic politics, as well as political philosophy, and international issues.
Episodes

Friday May 01, 2026
SCOTUS Draws a Distinction Without Difference
Friday May 01, 2026
Friday May 01, 2026
Alex opens the episode with an unexpected pairing—national parks and NBA blowouts—before turning to a Supreme Court decision that could fundamentally weaken the Voting Rights Act. He breaks down Justice Samuel Alito’s argument that the law has fulfilled its purpose in a changed America, and notes that he finds himself torn on parts of the Court’s reasoning, even as he grapples with its implications.
The episode traces how decades of rulings—beginning with Shelby County v. Holder—have steadily chipped away at the Voting Rights Act, and what that erosion means for minority representation today. The decision, he explains, appears to permit political gerrymandering while rejecting racial gerrymandering—what amounts, in practice, to a distinction without a difference. Featuring sharp warnings from dissenting justices and voting rights advocates, the podcast examines whether the United States is closing the chapter on a civil rights cornerstone or reopening old wounds.

No comments yet. Be the first to say something!